U.S. Figure Skating has addressed mounting questions over why it will not appeal the Olympic scores awarded to Madison Chock and Evan Bates, despite widespread frustration following a judging controversy involving the French panel. While many fans and analysts voiced outrage over the final placements, officials say there is a clear reason behind the decision.
In a formal statement, the federation emphasized that Olympic score appeals are extremely limited under International Skating Union (ISU) rules. Teams may only challenge technical errors — such as misidentified elements or calculation mistakes — not subjective program component scores or judging interpretations.
According to U.S. Figure Skating, a detailed review of the protocols showed no technical miscalls significant enough to warrant a formal appeal. Without a clear, rule-based error, an appeal would have no procedural standing and would almost certainly be rejected.
The controversy largely centers on perceived scoring inconsistencies, particularly within the program components. Critics argue that Chock and Bates delivered one of their strongest performances, yet the marks did not reflect what many believed was gold-medal quality. Some have pointed specifically to the French judge’s scoring as a flashpoint in the debate.
However, under ISU regulations, federations cannot appeal a judge’s evaluation simply because they disagree with it. Program component scores — which assess skating skills, performance, composition, and interpretation — remain subjective by design. Unless there is evidence of rule violation or mathematical error, the scores stand.
U.S. Figure Skating officials stressed that while they understand the emotional reaction from supporters, the federation must operate within established Olympic procedures. Filing an appeal without legitimate technical grounds could undermine credibility and distract from the athletes’ accomplishments.
Chock and Bates, meanwhile, have maintained a composed public stance. Though visibly disappointed after the event, the veteran ice dance team expressed pride in their performance and gratitude for fan support. Their response has mirrored the federation’s focus on professionalism and sportsmanship.
The situation has reignited broader conversations within the skating community about transparency and judging consistency. Critics argue that the subjective nature of figure skating scoring continues to create frustration, particularly in tightly contested Olympic events.
Still, officials made clear that disagreement alone does not equal appeal eligibility. The rules governing Olympic competitions are strict, and altering results requires documented procedural errors — not controversy or public pressure.
While the debate may continue among fans, U.S. Figure Skating’s position is firm: without a verifiable technical mistake, there will be no appeal. For Chock and Bates, the chapter closes not with a legal challenge, but with a performance that many believe will be remembered regardless of the final numbers.
